Skip to main content

A Trinity Sunday FizzBuzz Variation

Happy Trinity Sunday!

For those not familiar, Trinity Sunday is the day in the Church liturgical calendar that celebrates the great mystery of the Holy Trinity, the doctrine that Christians worship a 3-in-1 God.
God the Father. God the Son. God the Holy Spirit. Three Persons and One God. As introductions go, Wikipedia's is a bit heavy, but the whole doctrine is one of the great mysteries / paradoxes / intellectual conundrums of orthodox Christianity.

This year, as Trinity Sunday approached, I was thinking thoughts related to job interviews. One of the classic entry-level programming tests for such interviews is the FizzBuzz challenge, in which one is challenged to print the numbers 1 to 100 but, if the number is a multiple of 3, print "Fizz", if a multiple of 5, print "Buzz", and if a multiple of both 3 and 5, print "FizzBuzz"
I am not going to offer a solution to either FizzBuzz or my variation. A simple internet search will reveal implementations in dozens of different programming languages. And you, dear programmer, should be able to bang out an implementation in your language of choice in a matter of minutes, right?

So, in honour of Trinity Sunday, here is a Trinitarian Variation of the FizzBuzz problem:

Trinity-Fizz-Buzz Challenge:
Print the numbers 1 to 100. But in the following situations, print the text instead:

  • print "Father" if the number is a multiple of 2
  • print "Son" if the number is a multiple of 3
  • print "Spirit" if the number is a multiple of 5
  • if the number is a multiple of more than one of those factors (2, 3, 5) print all appropriate words, with no spaces between them.For example, print "FatherSonSpirit" if the number is a multiple of 2 and 3 and 5

Other variations on this Trinity-Fizz-Buzz (TFB) challenge:

  • If the classic Father - Son - Spirit terminology is not to your taste, substitute Creator - Sustainer - Redeemer instead;
  • At first I considered multiples of 3-5-7 instead of 2-3-5, but then the FatherSonSpirit combination would never occur between 1 and 100. So I stuck with the 2-3-5 primes as factors. But for more numbers, fewer text entries, try different factors like 3-4-5;
  • Require in the problem statement that "Father" always come first (since the Son is "begotten" of the Father and the Spirit "proceeds" from the Father ;)
So does this TFB have anything to offer? Does completing such an exercise tell us any more about the one being tested than FizzBuzz alone? It adds complexity to the problem statement, does it reveal anything more about the candidate in exchange for that cost?
FizzBuzz is a classic test because it does at least two things:

  1. it gives a challenge that falls outside the patterns of many school assignments;
  2. its conditions seem linear but cannot be implemented linearly without code duplication

They still apply to the TFB above. It fits the FizzBuzz mold in that sense. If anything, it amps up the code duplication aspect. We've gone from 4 cases in FizzBuzz to 8 in TFB, making the brute-force approach a bigger hassle.
On the other hand, a test with such obvious association with a particular faith perspective is likely to contravene loads of diversity policies at the company level, and have possible legal and human rights implications.

So I will end as I began, by wishing you, whatever your faith perspective, a happy Trinity Sunday! May you spend it contemplating some of the great mysteries of our existence, whether that be the Christian Trinity, the mystery of love, are we alone in the universe, or another of the big questions inherent in our life, death, and everything in between.

Popular posts from this blog

How to do Git Rebase in Eclipse

This is an abbreviated version of a fuller post about Git Rebase in Eclipse. See the longer one here : One side-effect of merging Git branches is that it leaves a Merge commit. This can create a history view something like: The clutter of parallel lines shows the life spans of those local branches, and extra commits (nine in the above screen-shot, marked by the green arrows icon). Check out this extreme-case history:  http://agentdero.cachefly.net/unethicalblogger.com/images/branch_madness.jpeg Merge Commits show all the gory details of how the code base evolved. For some teams, that’s what they want or need, all the time. Others may find it unnecessarily long and cluttered. They prefer the history to tell the bigger story, and not dwell on tiny details like every trivial Merge-commit. Git Rebase offers us 2 benefits over Git Merge: First, Rebase allows us to clean up a set of local commits before pushing them to the shared, central repository. For this

Java 8: Rewrite For-loops using Stream API

Java 8 Tip: Anytime you write a Java For-loop, ask yourself if you can rewrite it with the Streams API. Now that I have moved to Java 8 in my work and home development, whenever I want to use a For-loop, I write it and then see if I can rewrite it using the Stream API. For example: I have an object called myThing, some Collection-like data structure which contains an arbitrary number of Fields. Something has happened, and I want to set all of the fields to some common state, in my case "Hidden"

Git Reset in Eclipse

Using Git and the Eclipse IDE, you have a series of commits in your branch history, but need to back up to an earlier version. The Git Reset feature is a powerful tool with just a whiff of danger, and is accessible with just a couple clicks in Eclipse. In Eclipse, switch to the History view. In my example it shows a series of 3 changes, 3 separate committed versions of the Person file. After commit 6d5ef3e, the HEAD (shown), Index, and Working Directory all have the same version, Person 3.0.

Code Coverage in C#.NET Unit Tests - Setting up OpenCover

The purpose of this post is to be a brain-dump for how we set up and used OpenCover and ReportGenerator command-line tools for code coverage analysis and reporting in our projects. The documentation made some assumptions that took some digging to fully understand, so to save my (and maybe others') time and effort in the future, here are my notes. Our project, which I will call CEP for short, includes a handful of sub-projects within the same solution. They are a mix of Web APIs, ASP MVC applications and Class libraries. For Unit Tests, we chose to write them using the MSTest framework, along with the Moq mocking framework. As the various sub-projects evolved, we needed to know more about the coverage of our automated tests. What classes, methods and instructions had tests exercising them, and what ones did not? Code Coverage tools are conveniently built-in for Visual Studio 2017 Enterprise Edition, but not for our Professional Edition installations. Much less for any Commun

Scala Collections: A Group of groupBy() Examples

Scala provides a rich Collections API. Let's look at the useful groupBy() function. What does groupBy() do? It takes a collection, assesses each item in that collection against a discriminator function, and returns a Map data structure. Each key in the returned map is a distinct result of the discriminator function, and the key's corresponding value is another collection which contains all elements of the original one that evaluate the same way against the discriminator function. So, for example, here is a collection of Strings: val sports = Seq ("baseball", "ice hockey", "football", "basketball", "110m hurdles", "field hockey") Running it through the Scala interpreter produces this output showing our value's definition: sports: Seq[String] = List(baseball, ice hockey, football, basketball, 110m hurdles, field hockey) We can group those sports names by, say, their first letter. To do so, we need a disc